Government Needs to Get Out of Executive Compensation
Oct 22nd, 2009 by Shaun Carter
I think it’s indicative of the state of the nation’s intelligence when the general consensus among the public is that the government should be determining pay rates for executives of publicly traded companies. I wrote about this topic before with regards to the AIG bonuses and am further outraged by the current Administration’s intent to slash bank executive pay just to please shareholders.
Bush’s previous administration is just as guilty, if not more-so, than the banks themselves. Bush would speak ad naseum about how home ownership is a right for every U.S. citizen and he made it his mission to put everyone in a home, pressuring banks to loosen lending standards amidst skyrocketing home prices – which were caused by increased demand. For an MBA from Harvard, the former President had a lackluster knowledge of the damaging effects his policies would have on the economy.
This financial mess we find ourselves in today was created by government policy and is trying to be blamed on the banks themselves. Now, government policy is again causing problems by determining executive pay simply to please the public. Executive pay is high, but it is high for a reason. The job is tough, there is a lot of competition for talent and quite frankly those that lead multi-billion dollar companies should be paid as such. The thing more people need to do is put themselves in other people’s shoes before judging them.
What if the government decided that a fair wage for the work you do is half what you are getting paid now? You’d be outraged right? Mad that the government is taking away your money? Exactly.
